web 2.0
December 27th, 2005 by Sonja DuijvesteijnWhat is web 2.0? Is it just a buzz-word used to sell, or is it a technology?
Web 2.0 got it’s name from the web 2.0 conference and at first meant nothing. Now however web 2.0 points to a number of vague things like ajax, and democracy, and user based content. Web 2.0 means nothing.
In october 2004 a conference took place with the name “web 2.0″ and there it was discussed what implications it had the the web was becoming a real platform. Or put more clearly, now the web isn’t such a hype anymore what to do with it? And what is being done with it to make ’something’ a succes.
O’reilly (from the books) wrote something about that conference. He describes web 2.0 as adhering to 7 points:
1. Services, not packaged software, with cost-effective scalability
Like google, you don’t buy it in the store, and install it, you just use it. Very easy.
2. Control over unique, hard-to-recreate data sources that get richer as more people use them
Again, look at google, if everyone had the data they had, they’d have a much harder job. So get your own data, don’t buy it somewhere.
3. Trusting users as co-developers
Just look at firefox, what other users can’t do! Set up newsgroups, wiki’s forums and everything you need to get input from your users.
4. Harnessing collective intelligence
Use what people say and know in for example blogs.
5. Leveraging the long tail through customer self-service
Don’t only sell to the high end of the market, also sell to the kid who only has two pennies, just make sure you don’t have to service him personally.
6. Software above the level of a single device
Don’t make a different piece of software for every computer, make something that works!
7. Lightweight user interfaces, development models, AND business models
Don’t annoy the user with too much anything. And don’t annoy yourself by making everything complicated.
So, web 2.0 is more of a philosophy of how to make the web work according to O’reilly.
However that’s how it started, not how it ends up. It’ll end up as nothing. When I think of web 2.0 it’s a vague collection of phrases and ’something new’. When you google for web 2.0 you’ll find that this is a quite common way to see web 2.0. Vague. I hereby suggest that web 2.0 will stop being hyped and marketed, and only be used as the name of the convention.
Thus, web 2.0 is an empty frase meaning nothing.
Related posts
No related posts.
January 10th, 2006 at 10:51
i say web 2.0 started off as a new way to hype the web, where it seems to have turned out as sort of an open source promotional thing (;
the above points make clear that open source has the future. software development is not worth it for small companies, there are loads of cms-applications, adservers and other open source projects that can be of use to virtually anybody.
the web to me is a great place to share information, user forums on software usually help more than books and more and more people find their way to the World Wide Web. now let’s hope all browsers will stick to the W3C standards and webdevelopers see the need for well structured pages with valid code (:
great site btw.